|
Alicia Colon:
New York Sun Columnist
October 13, 2004
Hollywood Has a History Of Hysteria
Many Americans choose to have others do their thinking for
them when it comes to issues that need deep analysis and
research. Consequently, whether they'd like to admit it or not,
their opinions on these issues have been influenced by Hollywood
films and the mainstream broadcasting networks and press. When it
comes to the environment, government conspiracy theories, and,
most of all, the issue of abortion, people's ideological biases
and personal agendas can override factual data.
The film "The Day After Tomorrow" was the latest
nonsensical Hollywood offering dramatizing the cataclysmic
effects of global warming, a favorite topic of Vice President
Gore. But the history of disaster films based on environmental
hysteria goes way back to the 1950s, when Hollywood milked the
public fear of the Cold War through apocalyptic horror films.
Those movies showcased man's scientific manipulation of nature,
which resulted in the creation of giant ants, rats, and rabbits,
frogs, and even tomatoes. In 1973, the liberal fear of
overpopulation wrought the Charlton Heston opus "Soylent
Green." That crowd-pleaser depicted a 21st-century world of
mass hunger and anarchy, in which the only source of food is
soylent green, a substance of unknown origin. Voluntary suicide
is assisted by a government agency, which sends the citizen off
to the hereafter with halcyon images of trees, flowers,
waterfalls, and a natural beauty that no longer exists.
Well, its 2004,and those beautiful images still exist, and,
so far, none of the gigantic animal mutations threaten the world.
Although I have seen some rather healthy-sized New Jersey
tomatoes, they haven't yet managed to careen down the street
pulverizing pedestrians.
In Hollywood films, the government is always secretive and evil,
hiding the truth from the American public that an alien ship
crash-landed in Area 51.You mean you didn't know about that?
Apparently, the government has kept the spaceship and the bodies
of those aliens in an area called Groom Lake, which is 90 miles
north of Las Vegas. Thank goodness they've done that, because
when the aliens finally do attack us, as they did in the film
"Independence Day," we'll be able to use the space
technology from the captured spacecraft to defeat the invading
horde.
The mythological enemy government theory was further promulgated
by the hit television show "The X-Files." I thought it
ridiculous that any governmental undertaking that involved tons
of military personnel could ever be done secretly. Surely, the
wives, husbands, and other relatives and friends of the service
personnel involved would have broken the alien capture story long
before now.
All of this may seem ridiculous to anyone with half a brain, but
there is no doubt that the influence of film has been substantial
in many political issues. It is a shame that in the one area
where truth is absolutely essential, Hollywood seems adamant
about promoting its agenda via celebrities and disingenuous
entertainment vehicles. I expect the sad death of Christopher
Reeve will galvanize anew appeals for embryonic stem-cell
research, even though no ban on this research exists.
Billionaires George Soros and Teresa Heinz Kerry and their
friends in Hollywood could come up with the funds, since they
don't see any problem in the destruction of human life that the
research entails.
Ever since Roe v. Wade was passed in 1973, films have been skewed
to present abortion either as the only choice a woman has in a
crisis pregnancy or as a critical civil right endangered by
extreme right-wing fanatics. In "The Cider House
Rules," Michael Caine plays a benign abortionist who passes
his mantle of saintliness to his protege, Tobey Maguire. Abortion
rights advocates have succeeded in portraying prolifers as
interested only in the fetus, not the woman. Nothing could be
farther from the truth. I've yet to see a film offering a
positive view of adoption as an alternative to abortion.
Last week I was invited to an annual award ceremony by the
Catholic Home Bureau, which provides a number of social services
to the community. Among these is the Maternity Services and
Private Adoption Program. I spoke to the director of development,
Edward Short, and asked him: "How do you handle a case where
a young woman needs help with her home life?"
He answered, "Once an expecting mother enters our door, we
do everything we can to see to it that she delivers a healthy
baby into a strong, stable home. So whatever she needs - whether
it's a crib or layettes or maternity clothes or baby clothes or
emergency rent money or help with immunization - she gets. And
this is in addition to the pre- and post-natal care and
counseling." Referrals are also provided to maternity and
domestic-violence shelters. Services are offered to all
denominations and are available 24/7.
The truth really is out there, for anyone who knows where to
look.
|