West Side stadium. West Side stadium. That's all we hear
about, and the general consensus is that most New Yorkers do not
want it. Well, here's another option that I guarantee will win
unanimous approval: Why not build an East Side stadium on the
East River waterfront acreage where the United Nations currently
takes up valuable real estate?
Surely, I'm not the only New Yorker who's fed up with the
corruption, incompetence, and impotence of this Third World
bureaucratic dinosaur posing as a credible international
mediator. It's not just the oil-for-food scandal that makes me
wonder why this East Side behemoth is still tolerated in our
great city. No, it is how the United Nations has responded to
crises when they fell within the confines of its charter
obligations.
Part of Article 1 of the United Nations Charter reads: "To
achieve international co-operation in solving international
problems of an economic, social, cultural, or humanitarian
character, and in promoting and encouraging respect for human
rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction
as to race, sex, language, or religion."
Surely, acts of genocide should qualify as an international
problem, but as long as it takes place in African countries, like
Rwanda and the Sudan, the United Nations has not responded with
due diligence. Can it be that this anti-American organization is
also anti-African?
For once, the entertainment industry has performed a public
service by offering works that enlighten us on the horror that
took place in 1994 in Rwanda. Hollywood presented us last year
with "Hotel Rwanda," based on the real-life heroism of
an African "Schindler" by the name of Paul
Rusesabagina, who housed more than 1,000 targeted Tsutis in the
hotel he managed.
This Saturday, HBO will present "Sometimes in April,"
an extraordinary docudrama that, unlike "Hotel Rwanda,"
was actually filmed in Rwanda. Whatever stereotypical images we
have of a jungle-filled Africa will be dispelled bythe disturbing
sight of primal carnage taking place in a beautifully landscaped
country not that different from our own. I was reminded of
"Helter Skelter" and the Manson family running amok in
the canyons above Beverly Hills.
Not only will this cable movie clarify the events that led up to
the massacres, it will show the fecklessness of the U.N.
peacekeeping force whose main interest involved securing the
safety of Europeans in the area. The U.S. administration, cowed
by the disaster in Somalia, determined that Americans did not
have the will to send in troops to stop the genocide, so it did
nothing. Besides, it was Africans killing Africans and thus it
wasn't our business, we're told.
We hear so many critics of the Bush administration complain that
America should not be the policeman of the world. Whose job is
it, then? Certainly not the blue-helmeted peacekeepers that are
shown in the HBO film getting the stuffing kicked out of them by
the Rwandan Hutu military.
There also hasn't been too much press on what is occurring in
eastern Congo, where militia and renegade soldiers have been
raping and beating tens of thousands of women and young girls.
These crimes have gone unpunished because the judicial system
there has broken down. Enter the United Nations and oops!
Apparently, some of these so-called peacekeepers may even be
involved in the abuse. According to a March 8 report from the
Associated Press: "U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan
condemned the 'appalling misconduct of a minority of
peacekeepers' in late January after they were found to have
exploited women and girls in Bunia. Peacekeepers traded sweets,
eggs, or pocket change for sex, a U.N. investigation found. They
have been accused of raping girls as well."
Judging from President Bush's nomination of John Bolton, a known
U.N. critic, as the U.S. ambassador to the U.N., I'm assuming the
president's opinion of the U.N. is less than laudatory. Mr.
Bolton once noted that the U.N. Secretariat building in New York
"has 38 stories. If it lost 10 stories, it wouldn't make a
bit of difference."
Nevertheless, Mayor Bloomberg has supported U.N. expansion under
the mistaken opinion that the U.N. is an asset to the city. His
sister, Marjorie Tiven, has been dispatched to Albany to try to
break the legislative block in the Republican Senate on financing
this scheme.
I would suggest to the mayor that he tune in tomorrow to watch
"Sometimes in April," and perhaps he, too, will wonder
what good the United Nations does and how fast can we get rid of
it. East Side stadium, anyone?